|
Today, the wall street posted an editorial "The Microsofting of Apple" Claiming that Apple has become an organization obsessed with strategy rather than good products. The Apple iPad being an example. Now, I'll admit that I am a huge Apple fan. However, the headline does provoke thought, the meat of the article just doesn't resonate with me. I disagree with the premise that Apple is obsessed with out-strategy-ing their competition instead of making the best products.
One parallel between the two companies that I immediately thought of was the anti-trust claims against Microsoft because of the inclusion of Internet Explorer and no other browsers being bundled with the Windows operating system. Now, consider the iPhone. How do we browse the web? Safari, any other options? No. The reason? In accordance with the iPhone developers programs terms, you can't release applications to the App Store that compete with Apple's core applications. Applications such as Safari, iPod, Mail, etc...
Today, Opera announced a beta version of their Opera Mobile browser for the iPhone, but will it ever get released to the public? The browser claims to be 6x faster because there is a compression and caching layer causing much faster load times. If it doesn't get approved, I'd imagine there will be an outcry similar to when Google Voice didn't get approved.
Another interesting point is what Apple is doing to keep iTunes relevant and growing. I see Apple's iTunes as Microsoft's Office, it is the market leader and is the standard for that type of software. Instead of simply just revving on iTunes, which they also do, Apple designs complimentary products to expand iTunes. First it was tv shows with the iPod Video, Movie rentals and purchasing with the Apple TV, Apps with the iPhone and iPod Touch, and now Books with the new iPad. Each product builds on the previous release.
Now, think of Microsoft Office, what have they done in the last 10 years to the flagship office suite? Not a whole lot except for UI enhancements. They are mostly unchanged. The new 2010 version is supposed to be a lot better and has an online version of a lot of the applications within Office. This was done out of necessity because of competing products from Google, Apple, and OpenOffice.org. Microsoft doesn't innovate, the look at the lay of the landscape and do just enough to keep up with the competition. Microsoft is like a tenured professor, they've put in their time, they arent going anywhere, and they're not going to go the extra mile. |